I’m at the Antioch Writers’ Workshop in Yellow Springs, Ohio, as I always am the second week of July. So far the workshop’s fantastic, with “ah-ha!” moments scattered amidst the chuckles. And the hugs have been great! (more…)
Archive for the ‘Writing Life’ Category
Don’t Give Your Readers a Hunk of Wood to Gnaw On
Posted in Writing Life on July 11, 2011| Leave a Comment »
Take Another Step to Getting Published!
Posted in General, Writing Life, tagged get published, Speaking engagements, writing class on May 22, 2011| Leave a Comment »
| “Writing to Publish: Level II” at UC’s Communiversity |
|
|
You already know the nuts and bolts of being a writer. In this series, we’ll take your book idea, select one target publication and submit a query/proposal (as appropriate, according to genre and publisher). Prepare to come with one focused, solid idea and know who the audience is for that subject. We will also workshop your writing in at least one class. We recommend that you have completed at least one of my other courses, such as “Discover Your Writer Within” or “Writing to Publish I,” or that you have previous writing workshop experience.
|
|
|
Mon., 6:15 PM – 8:15 PM; 6/20/2011 – 8/8/2011(no class July 4 or July 11)
6 weeks; $119.00 , #3302 2220 Victory Parkway, Cincinnati, OH 45206. Park free in back lot off Cypress St. For parking and VP campus map: http://www.uc.edu/ce/documents/commu/VPAdminPark.pdf (Direction suggestions: http://www.uc.edu/ce/documents/commu/VP_Directions.pdf) Location: Administration Bldg, Rm 701 – UC Victory Pkwy Campus (historic Edgecliff by Eden Park); park free |
|
Shout Out to the Dayton Book Expo Organizers!
Posted in Writing Life on May 9, 2011| Leave a Comment »
Here’s a quick follow-up post to say thanks to the ladies of the Dayton Book Expo. Their hard work paid off in a wonderful cornucopia of books, authors and readers. It was especially refreshing to see young authors and readers enjoying the event. (more…)
Come See Me at the Dayton Book Expo on April 30
Posted in Book Reviews, Writing Life, tagged My books, self-published book, Speaking engagements on April 28, 2011| Leave a Comment »
Or I will be horribly lonely.
The “Dayton Book Expo” (being held 11 to 4 at Sinclair Community College) is going to be a blast, full of first-time authors telling their life stories, experienced novelists with another edge-of-your-chair romance, and panels of folks for you to listen to. Many of the books have been self-published, so if you think you might want to follow that path, follow I-75 to Dayton.
Now about that loneliness thing…. (more…)
Where Do We Learn to Criticize Others?
Posted in Sweet Links, Writing Life on March 28, 2011| 2 Comments »
Well there’s an interesting question.
Here’s another thought to ponder, which is more germane to writers: what’s the difference between criticizing and critiquing? The word “criticize” has the connotation that someone is only pointing out the negative aspects of something, although it does include in its definition the idea of looking at both merits and faults of something.
“Critique” sounds so much fancier (as do most words when you say them in French, as long as you pronounce them correctly). (And I’d like to digress a moment to say that b-e-a-u-c-o-u-p is pronounced “bo-COO,” not “BOO-coo.”) (OK, I’m done digressing.) (For now.)
Critique means to look at something critically, objectively and (one hopes) with some judgment or rationale. It’s not an emotional, personal attack. In theory.
So how does this play out for beginning writers? Many of us, at some point, find ourselves in a workshop where we need to share our writing out loud with others.
Our hands hold a paper on which we have dared to write down our experiences, our dreams, our imaginations — and all in the hope of getting it published someday, perhaps. Now we’re about to cast these words into the air for others to volley back and forth amongst them. It might be the first time these words have been given breath and made audible. By hearing them and commenting on them, our listeners make them real and validate us as writers. It’s forgivable if our hands shake a little, even a lot, as we read and serve the words into the air for the first time. We’re not looking for a service ace here. Oh, what a horrible feeling if they land with a thud amongst our audience and no one gets the ball going. We also fear the dreaded spike back in our face from the listener who’s only out to show that she’s a better player than we are. That’s not a good team player.
So where do we learn how to play this game of how to take someone’s prized possessions — their words — and play with them, think them over, and volley back suggestions for them to consider when they take their ball back home?
The two most common places are graduate school or writers’ workshops. I received my master’s degree not through an MFA program but through an MA program. If you don’t have the ability to commit to a multi-year graduate degree, the writers’ workshops are going to be a better option.
Here are some of my favorites, as well as a few that are very highly considered:
- Antioch Writers’ Workshop, Yellow Springs OH, July 9-15 (and I’ll see you there!)
- Midwest Writers Workshop, Muncie IN, July 28-30 (Say hello to “Doc” for me!)
- Taos Summer Writers’ Conference, Albuquerque NM, July 10-17 (a friend recommended it highly)
- Bread Loaf Writers’ Conference, Middlebury VT, August 10-20 (the deadline has already passed for applying, but the website is fun to peruse)
- Writer’s Digest offers great conferences and workshops, but usually in the fall and wintertime — so plan ahead!
If you’re in the Cincinnati area, I am holding workshops to focus on the art of critiquing, called “Writing Workshop Workshops.” The next one is April 17, 2011, at Allyn’s Café on Columbia Parkway at 2 p.m. Here’s more information.
The Arts of Being Critiqued and Critiquing Other People’s Writing
Posted in Writing Life on March 24, 2011| 5 Comments »
If you’re serious about becoming a published writer, eventually you will find yourself at a writers’ conference. (If you haven’t realized this yet, reread that first sentence. Then go here and peruse the offerings.)
Many writers’ conferences (similar to MFA programs) offer the opportunity to have your work critiqued. No, “offer the opportunity to have your work critiqued” is not a synonym for “force you to stand in front of a firing squad of wanna-be editors with loaded pens.”
Nevertheless, having your work critiqued in a workshop format for the first time can be intimidating, especially if for those doing the critiquing it’s the first time, also. But first, what am I talking about?
“Workshopping” your writing refers to bringing a sample of your writing (typically five to 10 pages, or one to three poems) to a group of other writers. Sometimes these folks will write in your genre; sometimes they will represent all sorts of genres: fiction, nonfiction, and memoir, perhaps. It is not critical that they write what you write. Some of my best critiques have come from people who do not write what I do. Some of my best critiques have come from non-writers! (But I’ll address that in a bit.)
Depending on the rules of the group, you will either be expected to just read your work while people listen and take notes, or you will also be asked to bring copies for each person to read along with you. In some writers’ groups, people share manuscripts this way and then just e-mail their comments back and forth. (I’m not a fan of this, but it’s off topic in any case.)
After you share your work, one way or another, then you receive the feedback. Sometimes people just volunteer to go in whatever order that strikes their fancy; sometimes the group follows a certain order, as if in a card game.
Some groups deliver the good comments and the negative feedback from one critic at the same time. Last year while working at the Antioch Writers’ Workshop (which I highly recommend, by the way), I heard author Donald Ray Pollock lead a group in their workshop session. He had them go around the room once and “share the love” with all the positive comments first. Then they went around the group again for all the negative comments after the writer was feeling good and ready to hear any criticism (in the more common use of the word).
Whichever way you choose to do it, both the “critiquers” and the “critiquees” should bear some things in mind.
Critiquers
- Do remember that you are not trying to fix the author’s work. Your job is to describe how the work affected you or what impressions you got from the work.
- Do phrase things in terms of how you read it or how you understood it. For example, “I might be misunderstanding this, but to me this passage sounds as if the dog is driving the car” instead of “Your antecedent is unclear” or “You need to change who ‘he’ refers to in the third paragraph.”
- Do remember that this is ultimately not your work. You can voice an opinion, but the person reading his or her work does not have to accept it.
- Do not be afraid to voice that opinion of yours, even if you think you are not as educated as others at the table. You might be right smack in the intended audience for that person’s work.
- Do handle other people’s feelings and their works with care and respect. You would ask the same. It will be your turn in a few minutes and we all know what paybacks are.
Critiquees
- Do try to sit and listen to the critiques. Do not argue or explain what you were thinking when you wrote it, but do ask for clarification if you don’t understand what the critiquer is saying.
- Do look at each person as she or he is talking to you. After all, didn’t your mommy or daddy teach you that, anyway?
- Do take notes.
- Don’t feel that you have to take everything seriously. Honestly, some comments that you will get are going to be completely off base. Remember, this is your work. Whereas some suggestions might make the work more saleable, they also might make it completely different from what you wanted it to be. The choice is yours.
If you’re interested in a very gentle “Writing Workshop Workshop,” I am holding monthly meetings in Cincinnati on Sunday afternoons. Check back often for the date and time.
Some Thoughts About Writers’ Block
Posted in Writing Life on December 5, 2010| Leave a Comment »
I don’t believe in it. I used to tell my college students and still tell those attending my writers’ workshops that there are two types of people who experience writers’ block: people who have never been introduced to the tools to avoid or overcome it and people who people who use it as an excuse to get out of working. Then they can talk about “their muse” and charter a plane to fly off to the Bahamas to sip Mojitos on the beach. Then I talk about “Prewriting, Freewriting and Rewriting.” Right now, I’ll just talk about “Prewriting.”
Prewriting activities are those things you do before you need to write. You need to know how you work best, and you need to have the correct tools on hand for the job.
Getting to Know You (and Your Preferences)
When I was in grade school, my teachers gave me very rigid conditions under which I had to do my homework. I had to have a strong light (some teachers even went so far as to specify fluorescent vs. incandescent, the wattage and which shoulder the light should be beaming over). I had to sit in a straight-backed wooden chair, at a student desk, with my feet flat on the floor. There could be no music or any other distracting sound. I could not eat or drink while I worked but I was supposed to get up every 15 minutes or so to stretch my legs.
Sounds like a good recipe for really creative processes, doesn’t it?
No, I didn’t think so, either.
I often ignored my teachers and did my homework lying on my stomach on the family room couch while listening to the New Christy Minstrels or Eugene Ormandy and the Philadelphia Orchestra performing Tchaikovsky’s “1812 Overture.”
If your grade school teachers were like mine, I am hereby giving you permission to get those demons out of your head. Intentionally consider under what conditions you write best.
For example, when I am writing nonfiction (such as this blog), I compose best directly on the computer. However, when I am writing fiction (such as my novel), I compose best long hand on regular, old-fashioned lined paper. The pen and the paper I choose depend on my mood. What chair and my position in it also depend on my mood.
And I still like to listen to Tchaikovsky’s “1812 Overture.”
Answer These Statements for Yourself:
My favorite chair to sit in while I write _______________________________________________________
Do I compose best on a computer or in long hand? ________________________________________________________
The type of pen I like best ________________________________________________________
Music that makes me feel creative _________________________________________________________
My favorite snack to have on hand while I work __________________________________________________________
My favorite drink and how it should be served ___________________________________________________________
(One of my friends notes in answer to the last one that the drink doesn’t matter so much as who is serving it: a tanned pool boy.)
Next you should consider when your best time of day is for what type of work. In a corporate setting, you might not have any control over this. If the boss comes to you and asks you to write something immediately, you can’t quite say, “Not now, boss; I would do much better at that if you come back in two hours.”
However, if you do have any control over your daily schedule, think about how your personal body clock operates. For example, I am a morning person. I think best in the morning and I am at my most creative in the morning. I try to get all my writing done before 1 or 2 in the afternoon.
After that, I do tasks that require my getting up and moving around. Otherwise, I get fairly sleepy and dull at that point. I also save phone calls for that time of day, if I can. (Yes, that means I am talking to people at my slowest times. Given my normal talking speed, it probably helps.)
I was asked to give a talk once to a group of inner-city high school students about writing careers and the importance of writing in other careers. First I gave them permission to slouch when they did their homework at home. Then I asked them if any of them hated writing. One young man, a football star, said that he hated writing but he wanted to be an engineer. His friends kind of mocked him when he said he wanted to be an engineer.
I asked him if he liked to sign his name on checks. He said he liked that.
I told him that people who could write better tend to get paid better. He said he liked that, too.
I told him that if you didn’t practice writing that when you had to do it, it was harder. I asked him if he had a big game coming up the following weekend and he said that he did. I said, “So I suppose you’re just sitting around this week doing nothing then, right? Hoping that when you hit the field you’ll be able to do what you have to do?” He said no, they had practice every day so that they could be in shape and know what the plays were.
I told him that writing was just like that. And all he had to do was find some topic that excited him, some pen or pencil that he liked to write with and some paper or computer that he liked to write on. Then I asked him every day to just jot down a couple of thoughts of his own or responses to something he heard someone else say. Then his writing would get stronger and stronger. Will you do that for me? I asked him. “Yes,” he said quietly. “You’re doing it for me now,” I told him, “but it’s really going to be for you down the road.”
Now: Go crank up that Tchaikovsky or AC/DC or Dead Paintball League, grab a quill pen or iPad and slouch your way to better writing!
Two X Chromosomes Do Not (Necessarily) an Editor Make
Posted in Writing Life, tagged editing, punctuation, self-published book, style guides on August 16, 2010| 4 Comments »
I’m about to conclude another year as a judge in the Writer’s Digest Self-Published Competition.
As in other years, the entries represent a range of what’s good and bad about self-published books. From each batch of 25 books, I must choose the top two to “bubble up” to the next round of judging. The choice is often difficult because I have too many that really are good. (Only one year was I overwhelmed with mediocrity and ultimately chose based on which two books had the fewest errors.) But, as always, I find myself thinking over and over: “Oh, this book could have been so good if only the author had hired an editor.”
I’ll back up a little. With self-published books, the author is paying to produce the book. So to produce a very clean, error-free book at the end, the author should have someone edit the book. But to hire someone means that the editor’s fee has to come out of the author’s own pocket.
Over the years, I have intuitively known that I cringe every time I see that the author has thanked someone for editing his or her book right up front in the acknowledgments, because I frequently turn the page and find a mistake right off the bat.
The clean, error-free books usually don’t have any editor acknowledged. This year I had an epiphany: that’s probably because the author hired an editor or proofreader and had to pay for the services. The author probably wasn’t feeling grateful but got a clean book out of the deal.
One year, an author thanked his mother for editing his book. I died a little inside. On the next page was the “forward” (which was spelled “foreward” on the cover of the book itself). It was a fantastic book! The mistakes killed me — it killed the book, too.
Another year, an author thanked his former English teacher for correcting the manuscript for him and gushed about what a great job she did. (I’ll save for another day my diatribe about the paradigm of “correcting” a manuscript and the implication that the author is wrong.) Sure enough, mistakes immediately followed.
English teachers are skilled in the “genre” of English classes. By chance, they might also know something about publishing. If you needed your taxes done, would you take all your receipts back to your old math teacher? He or she might, coincidentally, be an accountant — but that’s not what math teachers are trained to do.
The publishing world is different from the English classroom. For example, the “Bible” for the English teacher is the Modern Language Association’s MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers 7th Edition. Most publishers do not use MLA for their style guide; they’re more apt to use Chicago, Associated Press, Words Into Type or one particular to their industry.
The WD contest is not the only place I see this confusion over roles. In my own business, I often encounter clients or potential clients (or people I don’t want as clients) who say, “Oh, I don’t need your services. I’ll just ask my _________ to read my manuscript.” You can fill in that blank with the aforementioned English teacher or English grad student, secretary, wife or mother.
When I was studying for my master’s degree in English (with a concentration in editing and publishing), I learned that some studies have shown a connection between the association (in people’s minds) of women having neat handwriting and the assumption that therefore they make good writers. This assumption then, according to the research, has carried on throughout several decades. That is why we supposedly find more women in the writing professions.
It’s an interesting thought and I don’t know if I buy into it. I do know from practice, however, that whenever people say they don’t need me as an editor, it’s a woman’s name they offer up.
Nevertheless, to these people I advise: before you hand her your manuscript to edit, ask her how many spaces she puts after a period. If she says “two,” tell her to go back to her typewriter. She’s not the editor for you.
And if she says “too” and signs it “love, Mom,” tell her you don’t want to add to her work load. Take her out to dinner instead.
